Jim Ritts and improper summations

Defending Free Speech in Canandaigua and Ontario County... and New York State. The USA, too. Ummm, the World also. Heck, the Universe.
constructive_summer
Senior Minion
Senior Minion
Posts: 175
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:24 pm
antispam: No
The middle number please (3): 3

Jim Ritts and improper summations

Postby constructive_summer » Thu Aug 24, 2017 1:52 pm

272 A.D.2d 866
Supreme Court, Appellate Division,
Fourth Department, New York.
PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff–Respondent,
v.
Julius WARE, Defendant–Appellant.
May 10, 2000.

Attorneys and Law Firms

Scott P. Falvey, Canandaigua, for Defendant-Appellant.
James B. Ritts, Canandaigua, for Plaintiff-Respondent.

"....we express our strong disapproval of the comment by the prosecutor that, if being drunk was a defense, he would have to lay off half of his staff...."

Return to “The Home of the Minions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests